Caution: Chinese government may strengthen the internet control after the HIV-woman event
Because of her ex-boyfriend's online malicious slander, Yan Deli, an ordinary girl, was accused of "HIV-woman prostitute" and aroused a heated online condemnation. This also draws someone's attention who are very fond of such rumors. However, these people did not care about AIDS research nor social morality reconstruction, but took this "HIV-woman prostitute" event as an excuse, strongly advocate the NRS(Network Real-name System). It is so ironic! What did the HIV-woman event do with the Network Real-name System?
Lightson
Will NRS be the solution to this HIV-woman event? No. What if her ex-boyfriend said he just did "mistakenly charge" rather than a "false accusation"? Under such a condition, although there was NRS, can we preclude or pre-control the development of such kind of hearsay? We know there is NRS in South Korea at present, but there were some female movie stars commit suicide just because of the pressure from the internet. So will NRS stop rumors and slanders in China? Isn't domestic mainstream media too naive?
Lightson
What is the real purpose of Xinhuanet.com(which advocated NRS after the HIV-woman event)? Just read the article from xinhuanet.com: while recognizing the advantages of the network of public opinion, it insisted "too many internet users, too much freedom of speeches, no wonder why Zhou Jiugeng, a corrupted official in Nanjing, was exposed by Chinese netizens". It is obvious xinhuanet.com did not care about the spread of AIDS in the society, nor the degradation of social morality, but only concerned about the network's "too much freedom", because such a freedom of speech allows corrupted officials worried all day long, lets the officials to be exposed by the public, and also makes the so-called Network Sponsorship truly appear, isn't it too "inharmonious"? So, of course there shall be no freedom of speech in the Internet, and NRS is one of the best ways to block the freedom of speech.
Lightson
In the absence of effective supervision and officials' refusal to take the lead in NRS themselves (such as announcing their income and expenditures), the public has to guard against the NRS proposed by xinhuanet.com. Because such an NRS, to clamp down the freedom of speech, has every disadvantage and not a single advantage; it leads to the officials' freedom of speech and the public's unfreedom of speech, and the suppression of public opinion and the rigidity of social life.
Lightson
mirror link:
http://lightson.blog.hexun.com/39188097_d.html
Lightson
Will NRS be the solution to this HIV-woman event? No. What if her ex-boyfriend said he just did "mistakenly charge" rather than a "false accusation"? Under such a condition, although there was NRS, can we preclude or pre-control the development of such kind of hearsay? We know there is NRS in South Korea at present, but there were some female movie stars commit suicide just because of the pressure from the internet. So will NRS stop rumors and slanders in China? Isn't domestic mainstream media too naive?
Lightson
What is the real purpose of Xinhuanet.com(which advocated NRS after the HIV-woman event)? Just read the article from xinhuanet.com: while recognizing the advantages of the network of public opinion, it insisted "too many internet users, too much freedom of speeches, no wonder why Zhou Jiugeng, a corrupted official in Nanjing, was exposed by Chinese netizens". It is obvious xinhuanet.com did not care about the spread of AIDS in the society, nor the degradation of social morality, but only concerned about the network's "too much freedom", because such a freedom of speech allows corrupted officials worried all day long, lets the officials to be exposed by the public, and also makes the so-called Network Sponsorship truly appear, isn't it too "inharmonious"? So, of course there shall be no freedom of speech in the Internet, and NRS is one of the best ways to block the freedom of speech.
Lightson
In the absence of effective supervision and officials' refusal to take the lead in NRS themselves (such as announcing their income and expenditures), the public has to guard against the NRS proposed by xinhuanet.com. Because such an NRS, to clamp down the freedom of speech, has every disadvantage and not a single advantage; it leads to the officials' freedom of speech and the public's unfreedom of speech, and the suppression of public opinion and the rigidity of social life.
Lightson
mirror link:
http://lightson.blog.hexun.com/39188097_d.html
Comments